🔗 Share this article Latvian Lawmakers Decide to Exit International Accord on Protecting Females from Violence Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week The vote represents a blow for Latvia's conservative-leaning government leader, who addressed demonstrators outside the legislative assembly Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature. Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law. Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse. The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality. Ideological Debate and Resistance The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology". Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties. The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly. Political Divisions and Reactions One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities". The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them". The recent decision has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad. 22,000 people have endorsed a national petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people. Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent". He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply. Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns. Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints". Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court. "This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a rights activist. Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several European nations The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse Latvia's decision could influence similar debates in other EU countries